2014년 9월 9일 화요일

Research 5 : 10/24 What’s in a name? Real name policies and social networks(page 2-3)

Sources :
http://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/~drm/papers/2013_NamesHavePower%20paris%20vn.pdf


My Topic :
Network real-name system will bring about negative consequences.

What I hope to learn from this source:
I want to make sure that the network real-name system has negative effects on public's lives through this source.


Notes :
1.  The EFF recall that offline anonymity to foster political speech has been upheld as a constitutional right in McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm’n 514 U.S. 334, 357 (1995) with the resounding assertion that:

“Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. It thus
exemplifies the purpose behind the Bill of Rights, and of the First
Amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from
retaliation—and their ideas from suppression—at the hand of an
intolerant society. The right to remain anonymous may be abused
when it shields fraudulent conduct. But political speech by its
nature will sometimes have unpalatable consequences, and, in
general, our society accords greater weight to the value of free
speech than to the dangers of its misuse.”


2. At a personal level, many users find a real name policy is at best an annoyance, and at worst a potential bar on online participation. 

3.At a practical level, real name policies worsen the consequences of security breaches without providing any guarantees of improving the social vices they are designed to combat.

Final thoughts :
It was so hard to find this research paper. I wanted to know aspects of foreigners. Now I accomplished it through this source. On the next research I will search on the opposition's opinions.

댓글 없음:

댓글 쓰기