Sources :
http://www.hanyang.ac.kr/home_news/H5EAFA/0002/101/2008/1-1.pdf
My Topic :
The real-name system on the internet has constitutional problems that can bring about violation of freedom of expression.
What I hope to learn from this source:
I hope I can prove that the real-name system can violate both netizens' and internet press's freedom of expression from this source.
Notes :
"1. Public Election Act, the 82 number 6(In 2004)
1)If the internet-users want to update their comments a bout election on websites or cyber bulletin boards, they have to authenticate their identification, including their real name and registration number.
2)This act might be applied to websites that candidates make but since in this case it's just informal form one can avoid authenticating process.
3,4)The Ministry of Government Administration and people selected according to Home Affairs and the use and protection of credit information act will authenticate the internet-users' identification.
5) If the internet-users obey this act, their comments on websites will be eliminated and they will no longer update their ideas on the internet websites."
2.Public Election Act, the 261 number 1(In 2004)
"Unless the internet press take any step, the press will be punished with 10 million won penalty."
3.Public Election Act, the 82 number 6(In 2005)
"1)If the internet-users want to update their comments a bout election on websites or cyber bulletin boards, they have to authenticate their identification, including their real name and registration number.
2)This act might be applied to websites that candidates make but since in this case it's just informal form one can avoid authenticating process.
3)The Ministry of Government Administration and people selected according to Home Affairs and the use and protection of credit information act will authenticate the internet-users' identification.
4)Internet Press have to make system that if the internet-users authenticate their identification, "Authenticated Identification" has to be put next to the updated passage.
5)A passage without appearance of "Authenticated Identification" has to be eliminated."
4.Public Election Act, the 261 number 1(In 2005)
"Unless the internet press take any step, the press will be punished with 10 million won penalty."
"If the internet press don't eliminate a passage without "Authenticated Identification", they have to pay 3 million won penalty."
5. According to the law, the real-name system violates the freedom of expression, especially freedom of political expression.
6. According to the law, the real-system violates the internet press's freedom of expression and damage their business.
7. Public Election Act ,the 8 number 5
"Internet press is as similar as normal press. It has same right as normal press"
Final thoughts : It was really interesting source since I didn't know the constitutional controversy about the real-name system. In the next research I will move on to research about inefficiency of the real-name system.
1)If the internet-users want to update their comments a bout election on websites or cyber bulletin boards, they have to authenticate their identification, including their real name and registration number.
2)This act might be applied to websites that candidates make but since in this case it's just informal form one can avoid authenticating process.
3,4)The Ministry of Government Administration and people selected according to Home Affairs and the use and protection of credit information act will authenticate the internet-users' identification.
5) If the internet-users obey this act, their comments on websites will be eliminated and they will no longer update their ideas on the internet websites."
2.Public Election Act, the 261 number 1(In 2004)
"Unless the internet press take any step, the press will be punished with 10 million won penalty."
3.Public Election Act, the 82 number 6(In 2005)
"1)If the internet-users want to update their comments a bout election on websites or cyber bulletin boards, they have to authenticate their identification, including their real name and registration number.
2)This act might be applied to websites that candidates make but since in this case it's just informal form one can avoid authenticating process.
3)The Ministry of Government Administration and people selected according to Home Affairs and the use and protection of credit information act will authenticate the internet-users' identification.
4)Internet Press have to make system that if the internet-users authenticate their identification, "Authenticated Identification" has to be put next to the updated passage.
5)A passage without appearance of "Authenticated Identification" has to be eliminated."
4.Public Election Act, the 261 number 1(In 2005)
"Unless the internet press take any step, the press will be punished with 10 million won penalty."
"If the internet press don't eliminate a passage without "Authenticated Identification", they have to pay 3 million won penalty."
5. According to the law, the real-name system violates the freedom of expression, especially freedom of political expression.
6. According to the law, the real-system violates the internet press's freedom of expression and damage their business.
7. Public Election Act ,the 8 number 5
"Internet press is as similar as normal press. It has same right as normal press"
Final thoughts : It was really interesting source since I didn't know the constitutional controversy about the real-name system. In the next research I will move on to research about inefficiency of the real-name system.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기