It is not difficult to find cyber problems around us. It is easier to find malicious comments right around us. So recently discussion about the revival of network real-name system has appeared more than past. Looking at Iranian "Twitter Revolution" in 2009, we can know the power of anonymity, nonexistence of network real-name system. New York Times regarded Korean name naming system as a "silly" system. This newspaper criticized this system sharply mentioning relation between this system and dictatorship. Reversely, like Song Guanxing and Yang Pingfang, some regard this system as a effective social protection. In part, I agree that this system contributed to protection to some extent; but it is minimum. However, what we have to focus on is that this system generated social anxiety and didn't contribute to reduction of cyber problems and freedom of public's and press's expression. The real-name system is no longer a way of social protection, rather it can damage our society in the future. If we abolish the real-name system in our society completely, we will not worry about leakage of our identification to China or East Europe who we don't know. We will freely express our opinion about irrational policies, bad politicians and elections. We will make true democracy from removing this system. Lastly, it can contribute to make healthier cyber culture. "Do you want computers to know your whole identification?"or "Do you want to make your computer like "parents" who care all aspects of you?" If you want neither of them, you have to keep this in mind : Computers are computer. You are you. You cannot leave whole -yourself to computer as you do to your parents. Computers will betrayal you!
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기