Articulation

1) My argument 
I want to argue that people should not revive network real-name system as a solution to cyber problems. Recently, there are many cyber problems such as malicious comments, hacking, and so on. As Korea did in 2002, some people are calling for the revival of network real-name system. However, this system will bring about other problems if we revive it. 


2) How I found my argument 
My first research question was, what is real-name system? I can get to know accurate definition of the real-name system and simple history of this system. I can make sure all readers can know about the real-name system while reading my  argument from this source. The subsequent research was about constitutional controversy of the network real-name system. Using this source in my argument, I can prove the name naming system is unconstitutional effectively mentioning laws written in this source. In the next researches I focused on searching for inefficiency and risk of this system. Constitutional Research on Real-Name System and  Real-names or False-names? helped me a lot to strengthen my thesis statement. These sources are motivating me. I strongly believe my argument will be the most persuasive. 


3) New research questions 
I need to do more research about my topic.
a) What is Iranian "Twitter Revolution"?
b) Did real-name system discourage Iranian "Twitter Revolution?"
c) What kinds of websites do not use internet real-name system?
d) Why these websites do not use the real-name system and use anonymity system instead?

4) Connections to the Harvard Sampler
I came to this argument when I saw a sentence on page 28 : 
"Nor are such inovations socialy inevitable, even when widely 
diseminated, as Iranians discovered in the summer of 209 when they tried to send images of postelection uprisings out of the country. Such citizen journalism was simply banned, with heavy penalties imposed on transgresors." 
As I will deal with Iranian's "Twitter Revolution" ,censorship, and cyber problems in my persuasive essay, my argument is related to the Harvard Sampler's Internet section.